Search Results for

05 Oct
2017 Guide to Virginia Wind and Solar Policy
Thursday, October 5, 2017
Resource Type : Research or Whitepaper
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Ivy Main
Adoption Year : 2017
An overview of Virginia's Wind and Solar Policy.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Application of Appalachian Power Company for a 2014 Biennial Review of the Rates, Terms, and Conditions for the Provision of Generation, Distribution, and Transmission Services Pursuant to § 56-585.1 A of the Code of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Tax Issues    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2014-00026. This testimony explains why the Appalachian Power Company's ("the Company") proposed standby charge would constitute an unjust, unreasonable, and improper discriminatory rate charged on solar customer-generators. The testimony states the proposed charge is inadequately supported and fails to meet the requirements of Virginia Code § 56-594 F. Under this statute, the Company must prove that its proposed charge would recover “only the portion of the supplier’s infrastructure costs that
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Application of Appalachian Power Company for a 2014 Biennial Review of the Rates, Terms, and Conditions for the Provision of Generation, Distribution, and Transmission Services Pursuant to § 56-585.1 A of the Code of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Tax Issues    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2014-00026. This testimony explains why the Appalachian Power Company's ("the Company") proposed standby charge would constitute an unjust, unreasonable, and improper discriminatory rate charged on solar customer-generators. The testimony states the proposed charge is inadequately supported and fails to meet the requirements of Virginia Code § 56-594 F. Under this statute, the Company must prove that its proposed charge would recover “only the portion of the supplier’s infrastructure costs that
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Application of Appalachian Power Company for a 2014 Biennial Review of the Rates, Terms, and Conditions for the Provision of Generation, Distribution, and Transmission Services Pursuant to § 56-585.1 A of the Code of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Tax Issues    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2014-00026. This testimony explains why the Appalachian Power Company's ("the Company") proposed standby charge would constitute an unjust, unreasonable, and improper discriminatory rate charged on solar customer-generators. The testimony states the proposed charge is inadequately supported and fails to meet the requirements of Virginia Code § 56-594 F. Under this statute, the Company must prove that its proposed charge would recover “only the portion of the supplier’s infrastructure costs that
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Appalachian Power Company’s Integrated Resource Plan before State Corporation Commission of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Net Energy Metering    Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2015
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2015-00036. Addresses the legal and regulatory obligations imposed on Appalachian Power Company in seeking the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission's ("Commission") approval for its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan and rules adopted by the Commission. In light of those requirements, the testimony makes several findings, reaches a conclusion about the Appalachian Power Company’s application, and makes a recommendation to the Commission.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Appalachian Power Company’s Integrated Resource Plan before State Corporation Commission of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Net Energy Metering    Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2015
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2015-00036. Addresses the legal and regulatory obligations imposed on Appalachian Power Company in seeking the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission's ("Commission") approval for its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan and rules adopted by the Commission. In light of those requirements, the testimony makes several findings, reaches a conclusion about the Appalachian Power Company’s application, and makes a recommendation to the Commission.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago on behalf of Environmental Respondents In re: Appalachian Power Company’s Integrated Resource Plan before State Corporation Commission of Virginia
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Net Energy Metering    Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2015
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2015-00036. Addresses the legal and regulatory obligations imposed on Appalachian Power Company in seeking the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission's ("Commission") approval for its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan and rules adopted by the Commission. In light of those requirements, the testimony makes several findings, reaches a conclusion about the Appalachian Power Company’s application, and makes a recommendation to the Commission.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Solar Purchase Program proposal
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2012
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2012-00064. Testimony on behalf of Environmental Respondents before the State Corporation Commission of Virginia to support full and fair evaluation of Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Solar Purchase Program ("SP Program.") The testimony identifies positive and negative aspects of the SP Program proposal and alternative approaches and modifications to the proposal that could better serve the statutory and regulatory goals for solar energy in Virginia.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Solar Purchase Program proposal
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2012
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2012-00064. Testimony on behalf of Environmental Respondents before the State Corporation Commission of Virginia to support full and fair evaluation of Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Solar Purchase Program ("SP Program.") The testimony identifies positive and negative aspects of the SP Program proposal and alternative approaches and modifications to the proposal that could better serve the statutory and regulatory goals for solar energy in Virginia.
08 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Solar Purchase Program proposal
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2012
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2012-00064. Testimony on behalf of Environmental Respondents before the State Corporation Commission of Virginia to support full and fair evaluation of Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Solar Purchase Program ("SP Program.") The testimony identifies positive and negative aspects of the SP Program proposal and alternative approaches and modifications to the proposal that could better serve the statutory and regulatory goals for solar energy in Virginia.
06 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago In re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Integrated Resource Plan filing pursuant to Code of Virginia
Friday, May 6, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2013-00088. Testimony on behalf of Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Appalachian Voices, and the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club. The testimony evaluates the solar photovoltaic generation aspect of the Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP.") The author's overall finding is that the Company's approach to solar energy is incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate. Given specific deficiencies explained in the testimony, the Company's approach to s
06 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago In re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Integrated Resource Plan filing pursuant to Code of Virginia
Friday, May 6, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2013-00088. Testimony on behalf of Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Appalachian Voices, and the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club. The testimony evaluates the solar photovoltaic generation aspect of the Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP.") The author's overall finding is that the Company's approach to solar energy is incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate. Given specific deficiencies explained in the testimony, the Company's approach to s
06 May
Direct Testimony of Karl R. Rabago In re: Virginia Electric and Power Company's Integrated Resource Plan filing pursuant to Code of Virginia
Friday, May 6, 2016
Resource Type : Testimony
Topic : Valuation, Analysis, BCA    
State : Virginia    
Author : Karl R. Rábago (Rabago)
Adoption Year : 2014
Virginia State Corporation Commission Case No. PUE-2013-00088. Testimony on behalf of Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Appalachian Voices, and the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club. The testimony evaluates the solar photovoltaic generation aspect of the Virginia Electric and Power Company's ("the Company") Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP.") The author's overall finding is that the Company's approach to solar energy is incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate. Given specific deficiencies explained in the testimony, the Company's approach to s